Biodiversity Data JournalBiodiversity Data JournalBiodiversity Data JournalBDJ1314-28361314-2828Pensoft PublishersBiodiversity Data Journal10.3897/BDJ.1.e9922222IchneumonidaeAraneaeParasitologyTaxonomyFaunistics & DistributionMolecular systematicsFranceNetherlandsSpider hosts (Arachnida, Araneae) and wasp parasitoids (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ephialtini) matched using DNA barcodesMillerJeremy A.Drjeremy.miller@naturalis.nl1BelgersJ. Dick M.Mrfrisbel@hetnet.nl2BeentjesKevin K.Mrkevin.beentjes@naturalis.nl1ZwakhalsKeesMrkeeszwakhals@yahoo.com3van HelsdingenPeterDrpeter.vanhelsdingen@naturalis.nl4Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, NetherlandsWageningen University, Wageningen, NetherlandsDr. Dreeslaan 204, Arkel, NetherlandsEuropean Invertebrate Survey, Leiden, Netherlands
Corresponding author: Jeremy A. Miller (jeremy.miller@naturalis.nl).
Academic editor: Lyubomir Penev
201316920131e9921920131192013Jeremy A. Miller, J. Dick M. Belgers, Kevin K. Beentjes, Kees Zwakhals, Peter van HelsdingenThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The study of parasitoids and their hosts suffers from a lack of reliable taxonomic data. We use a combination of morphological characters and DNA sequences to produce taxonomic determinations that can be verified with reference to specimens in an accessible collection and DNA barcode sequences posted to the Barcode of Life database (BOLD). We demonstrate that DNA can be successfully extracted from consumed host spiders and the shed pupal case of a wasp using non-destructive methods. We found Acrodactylaquadrisculpta to be a parasitoid of Tetragnathamontana; Zatypotapercontatoria and Zatypotabohemani both are parasitoids of Neottiurabimaculata. Zatypotaanomala is a parasitoid of an as yet unidentified host in the family Dictynidae, but the host species may be possible to identify in the future as the library of reference sequences on BOLD continues to grow. The study of parasitoids and their hosts traditionally requires specialized knowledge and techniques, and accumulating data is a slow process. DNA barcoding could allow more professional and amateur naturalists to contribute data to this field of study. A publication venue dedicated to aggregating datasets of all sizes online is well suited to this model of distributed science.
DNA barcodehostmorphological identificationnon-destructive extractionparasitoidIntroduction
Parasitoid wasps are among the most significant enemies of spiders (Foelix 2011). Among the ichneumonid wasps, there are parasitoids of spider eggs, as well as ectoparasitoids of post-embryonic spiders. The "Polysphincta group" of the tribe Ephialtini (also referred to by its junior synonym Polysphinctini) informally refers to those ichneumonids that attack post-embryonic spiders, typically of web-building species. These wasps develop as larvae attached to the abdomen of the spider (Figs 1, 5, 9). This host-parasitoid relationship is distinctive because the mobile spider continues to grow and develop along with the larval parasitoid attached to its abdomen (koinobiont ectoparasitoid). Ultimately, the host is killed and consumed by the larva just prior to pupation. In some cases, the behavior of the spider is modified towards the end of its life to the advantage of the parasitoid (Eberhard 2000).
Most primary data associating spiders and their parasitoid species comes from rearing, i.e., keeping the host spider alive in the lab long enough for the wasp to mature (e.g., Bristow 1941, Nielsen 1923). This approach requires care, hard work, and expertise, and the accumulation of data is a slow process (Fitton et al. 1987). Furthermore, in our experience with "Polysphincta group" wasps, few spider hosts reach maturity before their parasitoids do. This is unfortunate from the perspective of the biologist because most of the best diagnostic morphological characteristics for spider species identification appear only in the adult stage. As a result, positive identification of the host is often elusive and the literature is blemished by dubious host-parasitoid association records (e.g., Shaw 2006).
The advent of DNA barcoding offers a path to species determination where traditional morphology falls short. Increasingly, studies of parasitoids and their hosts are turning to DNA-based methods as an alternative or supplement to rearing (Santos et al. 2011, Hrcek et al. 2011, Rougerie et al. 2011, Quicke et al. 2012). Here we apply DNA barcoding techniques to positively associate parasitoids and their hosts. None of the spider hosts in this study reached maturity before being killed by their parasitoid. We successfully obtained DNA barcode sequences from the spider host remains left by the wasp just before pupation (Figs 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 14, 17). Adult wasps were identified using traditional morphology.
Materials and methods
In most cases, juvenile spiders observed to be hosting wasp larvae were collected live in the field and taken to the lab for rearing (Figs 1, 5, 9). The adult wasp was allowed to fully develop, killing the host spider in the process. In one record from France, the wasp had already killed its host and pupated inside a loose silk cocoon (Figs 18, 19). In all cases, the host spider died as a subadult and the body was left in poor condition, rendering positive identification by means of traditional morphology unreliable (Figs 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 14, 17). DNA extractions were performed using the Thermo Labsystems KingFisher extraction robot at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center DNA barcoding facility. For host spiders, DNA was extracted by placing the entire specimen directly (without grinding) in lysis buffer with proteinase K for the three hour incubation step. After incubation, the specimen was returned to ethanol and the extraction continued using the lysis buffer solution. This caused negligible further damage to the specimen. In one case, DNA was also extracted from a wasp larval exuvium by this method (Fig. 7). For adult wasps, one leg was removed as source tissue for DNA extraction. To obtain the standard animal DNA barcode fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (Hebert et al. 2003), PCR was performed using either the primers LCO1490 (5'-GGTCAACAAATCATCATAAAGATATTGG-3') (Folmer et al. 1994) and Chelicerate Reverse 2 (5'-GGATGGCCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATG-3') (Barrett and Hebert 2005) (for spiders and larval exuvium) or a coctail of primers LCO1490 (Hebert et al. 2003) and LepF (5'-ATTCAACCAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3') paired with HCO2198 (5'-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3') (Folmer et al. 1994) and LepR1 (5'-TGATTTTTTGGACATCCAGAAGTTTA-3') (Hebert et al. 2003) (for adult wasps). PCR reactions contained 18.75µl mQ, 2.5µ 10x PCR buffer CL, 1.0µl 25mM of each primer, 0.5µl 2.5mM dNTPs and 0.25µl 5U Qiagen Taq. PCR was performed using initial denaturation of 180s at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15s at 94°C, 30s at 50°C and 40s at 72°C, finished with a final extension of 300s at 72°C and pause at 12°C. Sequencing was performed by Macrogen (http://www.macrogen.com). For all barcoded specimens, sequences, images, and collection data were uploaded to the Parasitoid Wasps and Spider Hosts project (PWSH) on the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD; http://www.boldsystems.org/). The "Species Level Barcode Records" search of the BOLD database assisted in host spider identification. Where that was unsuccessful, we resorted to the "All Barcode Records on BOLD" search option and Blast search on NCBI's Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/gquery). Historical literature records of host-parasitoid associations relied on the World Ichneumonoidea database (Yu et al. 2012); primary literature was typically not consulted. For Dutch specimens, latitude and longitude coordinates are converted from the local RD (Rijksdriehoeksmeting) coordinate system; for the French record, coordinates are latitude and longitude. All voucher specimens are deposited in the collection of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center with the exception of one wasp retained in the
personal collection of Kees Zwakhals
(KZPC).
Taxon treatmentsRank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialParasite of: Tetragnathamontana Simon, 1874Root classification: 8Acrodactylaquadrisculptahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_TaxonPage?subtaxa=hidden&taxid=150402http://hol.osu.edu/?id=50298(Gravenhorst, 1820)Materials
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.INS.593867; recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: female; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.ARA.14127; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PWSH001-13; Taxon: genus: Acrodactyla; specificEpithet: quadrisculpta; scientificNameAuthorship: (Gravenhorst, 1820); Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 04/17/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.INS.593868; recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: male; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.ARA.14128; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PWSH002-13; Taxon: genus: Acrodactyla; specificEpithet: quadrisculpta; scientificNameAuthorship: (Gravenhorst, 1820); Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 04/19/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Occurrence: recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: male; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.ARA.14129; Taxon: genus: Acrodactyla; specificEpithet: quadrisculpta; scientificNameAuthorship: (Gravenhorst, 1820); Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 04/19/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: KZPC; basisOfRecord: specimen
Notes
Shaw (2006) notes the possibility of some confusion in the literature concerning this parasitoid and the morphologically similar Acrodactylacarinator (Aubert, 1965). Errors in identification of the parasitoid and/or host may be obscuring the true host specificity of these wasps in some parts of their distribution.
Adult wasps were identified as Acrodactylaquadrisculpta (Figs 4, 8) by an experienced ichneumonid taxonomist based on morphological characteristics with reference to the taxonomic literature. DNA barcodes derived from two adult specimens (RMNH.INS.593867 and RMNH.INS.593868) plus the larval exuvium (Fig. 7) were used to query the BOLD database; no match was found. The barcode sequence from the larval exuvium was identical to that of the adult (RMNH.INS.593868) except that the last 9 bases on the 3' end were not sequenced. A subsequent Blast search of NCBI's GenBank found sequences identified as Acrodactylaquadrisculptata among the closest matches. However, the closest matching sequences scored only 93% similarity, lower than expected for most conspecific DNA barcodes. Of the 12 sequences with this similarity score, three were identified as Acrodactylaquadrisculpta; the remaining sequences were less precisely identified but the taxonomic information was not in conflict with Acrodactylaquadrisculpta. Most if not all of the closest matching DNA barcode sequences were derived from specimens collected in Manitoba, Canada. The resolution of these facts might lie in a high genetic diversity within this widespread species, or taxonomic error at some level. One specimen of Acrodactylaquadrisculpta was not sequenced and remains in the personal collection of Kees Zwakhals (KZPC).
Rank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialRoot classification: 8Host of: Acrodactylaquadrisculpta (Gravenhorst, 1820)Tetragnathamontanahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_TaxonPage?subtaxa=hidden&taxid=178345http://www.araneae.unibe.ch/data/846/Tetragnatha_montanaSimon, 1874Materials
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.ARA.14127; recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: juvenile; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.INS.593867; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=NLARA239-12; Taxon: genus: Tetragnatha; specificEpithet: montana; scientificNameAuthorship: Simon, 1874; Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 03/30/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.ARA.14128; recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: juvenile; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.INS.593868; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=NLARA250-12; Taxon: genus: Tetragnatha; specificEpithet: montana; scientificNameAuthorship: Simon, 1874; Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 04/01/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.ARA.14129; recordedBy: J. Dick M. Belgers; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: juvenile; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=NLARA260-12; Taxon: genus: Tetragnatha; specificEpithet: montana; scientificNameAuthorship: Simon, 1874; Location: country: Netherlands; stateProvince: Gelderland; locality: Wageningen, Blauwe Kamer; decimalLatitude: 51.943995; decimalLongitude: 5.61874; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: found (by beating) on fijnspar (Norway Spruce, Picea abies); eventDate: 04/01/2012; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Notes
A search of the BOLD database indicated that the host for all three Acrodactylaquadrisculpta specimens was Tetragnathamontana Simon, 1874. Host sequences scored 98.3%-100% similarity with 21 other data points identified as Tetragnathamontana with DNA barcode sequences available in BOLD (all private or early-release at the time of writing). Some of the 100% matches were Tetragnathamontana specimens sequenced as part of a DNA barcoding study on Dutch spiders (Miller et al. 2013). Acrodactylaquadrisculpta has been associated historically with a number of host species in the genus Tetragnatha including Tetragnathamontana (Yu et al. 2012).
Rank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialParasite of: Neottiurabimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767)Root classification: 8Zatypotapercontatoriahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_TaxonPage?subtaxa=hidden&taxid=449209http://hol.osu.edu/index.html?id=50450(Müller, 1776)Materials
Rank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialRoot classification: 8Host of: Zatypotapercontatoria, ZatypotabohemaniNeottiurabimaculatahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_TaxonPage?subtaxa=hidden&taxid=29775http://www.araneae.unibe.ch/data/56/Neottiura_bimaculata(Linnaeus, 1767)Materials
A search of the BOLD database indicated that these two hosts are Neottiurabimaculata (Linnaeus, 1767) (Figs 11, 14). Host sequences scored 96.8%-99.5% similarity with 20 other data points identified as Neottiurabimaculata with DNA barcode sequences available in BOLD including three specimens from a study on Dutch spiders (Miller et al. 2013). Two parasitoid species were found to be associated with Neottiurabimaculata: Zatypotapercontatoria (Figs 12, 13) and Zatypotabohemani (Figs 15, 16). Neither parasitoid had been associated previously with Neottiurabimaculata hosts (Yu et al. 2012).
Rank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialParasite of: Dictynidae sp.Root classification: 8Zatypotaanomalahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=482017http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=449222http://hol.osu.edu/index.html?id=50410(Gravenhorst, 1820)ZatypotaanomalaThis species was transfered from the genus Sinarachna to Zatypota by Zwakhals (2006), but this act has not been consistently reflected by some online resources. Hymenoptera Online lists this species under Sinarachna. BOLD has data under both Sinarachnaanomala and Zatypotaanomala.Materials
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.INS.593866; recordedBy: Hélène Dumas; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.ARA.14254; Location: country: France; stateProvince: Bouches-du-Rhône; verbatimLocality: La Ciotat; decimalLatitude: 43.198642; decimalLongitude: 5.631474; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: in my semi-wild garden under a leaf of Pittosporum tobira, at about 1.3 m high, cocoon with wasp pupa and dead host found 13 July 2012, cut leaf with cocoon kept outside, sheltered from sun and rain; eventDate: 2012-07-20; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Rank: SpeciesType of treatment: Redescription or species observationextantHabitat: terrestrialRoot classification: 8Host of: Zatypotaanomala (Gravenhorst, 1820)Dictynidae
sp.
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_TaxonPage?subtaxa=hidden&taxid=1343http://www.araneae.unibe.ch/list/gen/taxId/17/DictynidaeMaterials
Occurrence: catalogNumber: RMNH.ARA.14254; recordedBy: Hélène Dumas; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: juvenile; associatedOccurrences: RMNH.INS.593866; associatedSequences: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PWSH009-13; Location: country: France; stateProvince: Bouches-du-Rhône; verbatimLocality: La Ciotat; decimalLatitude: 43.198642; decimalLongitude: 5.631474; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 30; Event: samplingProtocol: in my semi-wild garden under a leaf of Pittosporum tobira, at about 1.3 m high, cocoon with wasp pupa and dead host found 13 July 2012, cut leaf with cocoon kept outside, sheltered from sun and rain; eventDate: 2012-07-13; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH; basisOfRecord: specimen
Notes
The host specimen could not be precisely identified using either morphology or the Species Level Barcode Record search of the sequence library available on BOLD at the time of this writing. A more general search of BOLD using the All Barcode Records search option returned a closest match (95.26% similarity) with the dictynid Nigmawalckenaeri. A query of Genbank returned a closest match (88%) with Dictynalatens. A calamistrum is visible on the fourth metatarsus of the presereved host specimen (Fig. 17). The calamistrum is an organ involved in the spinning of cribellate silk (Köhler and Vollrath 1995, Opell 1998). The presence of a cribellum alone eliminates the vast majority of European spider taxa. In combination with the overall size and shape, we conclude this host belongs to the spider family Dictynidae. The World Ichneumonoidea database on Taxapad indicates that Zatypotaanomala (Fig. 20) has been associated with dictynid spider hosts (Yu et al. 2012). The incompletely identified host DNA barcode sequence has been deposited in BOLD. As the library of reference sequences grows, it may become possible to identify this host to species. An attempt to barcode the parasitoid Zatypotaanomala was not successful.
Discussion
DNA barcoding is best thought of as a supplement, not a replacement, for traditional methods of taxonomic identification because both approaches have different, often complementary strengths and limitations (Dayrat 2005, Will et al. 2005). There are now many examples where the integration of DNA sequence data and morphological data have advanced knowledge in ways that would not have been possible without this synergy (Riedel et al. 2013, Paquin and Hedin 2004). The study presented here is a case where morphology alone is not adequate because of the physical condition and developmental stage of the host at the time of death. Fortunately, we found that the condition of the host specimens did not prevent the generation of DNA barcode sequence data.
Major advances in the study of host-parasitoid relationships require primary data from a wide taxonomic and geographic range. Questions about host specificity and changes in host-parasitoid relationships across large spatial scales are two important topics hamstrung by the scarcity of primary data. But the slow pace of traditional approaches means that few specialists can be dedicated to this area of study. These days, DNA barcoding requires far less expertise, opening the door for more non-specialists to contribute data in small quantities. Depositing these data online in community databases like BOLD, and publishing results in an internet savvy journal dedicated to aggregating datasets of all sizes, offers a strategy for advancing knowledge of host-parasitoid relationships not available to previous generations of scientists.
Acknowledgements
Institutional funding and support provided by the Naturalis Biodiversity Center. Thanks to Jan van Tol for administrative support, and to the Naturalis DNA Barcoding Facility for their efficiency and professionalism. Special thanks to Hélène Dumas for contributing the specimens from La Ciotat. Jose Fernandez-Triana (University of Guelph and Canadian National Collection), Matjaz Kuntner (Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts), Pavel Stoev (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Pensoft Publishers), and Lyubomir Penev (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Pensoft Publishers) provided helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript. Kees van Achterberg (Naturalis Researcher) provided helpful guidance and advice.
ReferencesBarrettRowan D. HHebertPaul D. N2005Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes833481491http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/z05-02410.1139/z05-024BristowW.1941The Comity of Spiders, Volume 2Ray SocietyLondon560DayratB.2005Towards integrative taxonomy85340741510.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.xEberhardW.2000Spider manipulation by a wasp larva40625525610.1038/35018636FittonM.ShawM.AustinA.1987The Hymenoptera associated with spiders in Europe901659310.1111/j.1096-3642.1987.tb01348.xFoelixR.2011Biology of Spiders. Third editionOxford University PressOxford419FolmerO.BlackM.HoehW.LutzR.VrijenhoekR.1994DNA primers for the amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates35294299HebertP. D. N.CywinskaA.BallS. L.deWaardJ. R.2003Biological identifications through DNA barcodes2701512313321http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.221810.1098/rspb.2002.2218HrcekJanMillerScott E.QuickeDonald L. J.SmithM. Alex2011Molecular detection of trophic links in a complex insect host-parasitoid food web115786794http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03016.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03016.xKöhlerTamaraVollrathFritz1995Thread biomechanics in the two orb-weaving spiders Araneus diadematus (Araneae, Araneidae) and Uloboruswalckenaerius (Araneae, Uloboridae)2711117http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jez.140271010210.1002/jez.1402710102MillerJeremy A.BeentjesKevin K.HelsdingenPeter vanIJlandSteven2013Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes? A time series study of spiders in alcohol0000NielsenE.1923Contributions to the life history of the pimpline spider parasites (Polysphincta, Zaglyptus, Tromatobia)14137205OpellB. D.1998Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk124613624http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00222.x10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00222.xPaquinP.HedinM.2004The power and perils of ‘molecular taxonomy’: a case study of eyeless and endangered Cicurina (Araneae: Dictynidae) from Texas caves131032393255http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02296.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02296.xQuickeDonald L. J.SmithM. AlexAchterbergCornelis vanMillerScott E.HrcekJan2012A new genus and three new species of parasitoid wasp from Papua New Guinea and redescription of Trigonophatnus Cameron (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae)462113691385http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222933.2012.65858510.1080/00222933.2012.658585RiedelAlexanderSagataKatayoSuhardjonoYayuk RTänzlerReneBalkeMichael2013Integrative taxonomy on the fast track - towards more sustainability in biodiversity research10115http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/10/1/1510.1186/1742-9994-10-15RougerieR.SmithM. S.Fernandez-TrianaJ.Lopez-VaamondeC.RatnasinghamS.HebertP. D.N.2011Molecular analysis of parasitoid linkages (MAPL): gut contents of adult parasitoid wasps reveal larval host20117918610.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04918.xSantosA.BesnardG.QuickeD.2011Applying DNA barcoding for the study of geographical variation in host-parasitoid interactions111465910.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02889.xShawM.2006Notes on British Pimplinae and Poemeninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), with additions to the British list19217238WillKiplingMishlerBrentWheelerQuentin2005The Perils of DNA Barcoding and the Need for Integrative Taxonomy545844851http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1080/1063515050035487810.1080/10635150500354878YuDicky S.AchterbergKees vanHorstmannKlaus2012World Ichneumonoidea 2011. Taxapad 2012http://www.taxapad.comZwakhalsKees2006The European species of the genera Zatypota and Sinarachna (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae, Polysphinctini)663437
Live Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14127) parasitized by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (RMNH.INS.593867).
Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14127) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (RMNH.INS.593867). Overall view.
Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14127) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (RMNH.INS.593867). Detail of prosoma.
Live adult female Acrodactylaquadrisculpta (RMNH.INS.593867).
Live Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14128) parasitized by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (RMNH.INS.593868).
Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14128) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (RMNH.INS.593868).
Larval exuvium of Acrodactylaquadrisculpta (RMNH.INS.593868). DNA barcode sequence was obtained from this specimen.
Live adult male Acrodactylaquadrisculpta (RMNH.INS.593868).
Live Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14129) parasitized by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva (KZPC).
Tetragnathamontana (RMNH.ARA.14129) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Acrodactylaquadrisculpta larva.
Neottiurabimaculata (RMNH.ARA.14036) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Zatypotapercontatoria larva (RMNH.INS.593327).
Silk coccoon of Zatypotapercontatoria (RMNH.INS.593327), preserved specimen.
Adult female Zatypotabohemani (RMNH.INS.593328), specimen, detail of pronotum.
Dictynidae sp. (RMNH.ARA.14254) preserved in alcohol after being consumed by Zatypotaanomala larva (RMNH.INS.593866). Arrow indicates calamistrum, a morphological structure found in some dictynid species, but relatively few other European spiders.
Zatypotaanomala (RMNH.INS.593866) undergoing metamorphosis in the field.
Silk coccoon of Zatypotaanomala (RMNH.INS.593866) in the field.