Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal BDJ 1314-2836 1314-2828 Pensoft Publishers Biodiversity Data Journal 10.3897/BDJ.2.e991 2724 Animalia Invertebrata Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Hymenoptera Ceraphronoidea Megaspilidae Taxonomy Systematics Asia Central Asia Indian Sub-Continent and Himalayas India Andaman and Nicobar Islands First report of the genus Conostigmus Dahlbom (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea: Megaspilidae) from India with description of a new species Bijoy C Mr bejoyaaryan@gmail.com 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:5A28666A-AB92-4057-8E28-919CCFBE8D6F Rajmohana K Dr mohana.skumar@gmail.com 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6B020B53-1652-4291-BB67-0D81D708D758 Kumar Ramesh Dr drrameshtrichy@gmail.com 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:7C3F06B4-E208-4E35-ADDB-D31FD2CB2450 Western Ghats Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Calicut-673006, Kerala, India National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Hebbal, Bangalore-560024, Karnataka, India

Corresponding author: C Bijoy (bejoyaaryan@gmail.com).

Academic editor: Lyubomir Penev

2014 02 01 2014 2 e991 30 08 2013 26 12 2013 C Bijoy, K Rajmohana, Ramesh Kumar This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B5C7A33-F8F5-489A-9A3C-A736B5FB1AB6

The genus Conostigmus Dahlbom (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea: Megaspilidae) is reported for the first time from India, along with description and illustration of Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. A comparative discussion on the morphological affinities of the new species with its putative sister Conostigmus tubifer Dessart is provided. An intermixing of character states of genera Conostigmus as well as Dendrocerus Ratzeburg is observed.

Conostigmus Megaspilidae new species India Zoological Survey of India.
Introduction

Superfamily Ceraphronoidea (Hymenoptera) comprises two extant families of parasitoid wasps, Ceraphronidae and Megaspilidae (Johnson and Musetti 2004). Megaspilidae includes 305 valid species in 13 genera (http://hol.osu.edu/index.html?id=91). The species of Megaspilidae are generally ectoparasitoids attacking cocoons and puparia, primarily on Diptera, Neuroptera, Coleoptera, Mecoptera and also as hyperparasitoids of Hymenoptera (Dessart 1995).

Among the 13 genera of Megaspilidae, the most speciose and widely distributed are Dendrocerus Ratzeburg 1852 and Conostigmus Dahlbom 1858. The genus Conostigmus was erected by Dahlbom (1858), as a subgenus of Megaspilus Westwood, with Megaspilus alutaceus Thomson as type species. Later in 1951, Muesebeck and Walkley elevated the taxon to generic level. The genus is distributed widely in all geographical realms and has 168 species. Only 9 species have been reported from Oriental region so far (Johnson and Musetti 2004, Dessart 1997) (catalogued as 8 species by Johnson and Musetti (2004), missing out Conostigmus occipitalis Dessart 1997).

In continuation with our pioneer taxonomic studies on the superfamily Ceraphronoidea of India, a new species of Conostigmus viz. Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. is hereby described and illustrated. A comparative discussion on the morphological affinities of the new species with Conostigmus tubifer Dessart 1997, the most resembling species is also provided. Both the species are remarkable for their intermixing of characters seen in two genera, Conostigmus and Dendrocerus.

Materials and methods

The specimens under study were collected using malaise trap set among the grassy patches of Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. The specimens were card mounted on point-card tips. Description and imaging works were carried out employing Leica M205A stereomicroscope, with 1 × objective and Leica DFC-500 digital camera. Morphological terminology follows Fergusson (1980), Dessart (1997) and Miko and Deans (2009). Based on Dessart (1997), we have attempted to define the various states of ocellar triangle in Megaspilidae. If OOL > POL, the ocellar triangle is ‘narrow-based’ and if OOL < POL, the triangle is ‘broad-based’. If POL = LOL, then the ocellar triangle is ‘Equilateral’, and if POL is not equal to LOL, the triangle is ‘Isosceles’, the condition most common in occurrence. The triangle is said to be ‘short’ when LOL < POL and ‘long’ when LOL > POL.

Both the Holotype and the Paratypes are deposited in the National Zoological Collection at Zoological Survey of India, Calicut.

Abbreviations: DFIm

– Minimal Interocular Facial Distance

; OOL

– Ocellocular Length

; POL

– Postocellar Length

; LOL

– Lateral Ocellar Length

; T3

– Metasomal tergite 3

.

NHM

– Natural History Museum, London

.

Taxon treatments Conostigmus neotubifer urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4BF76167-8B66-4FB5-B4C1-DEB4C9FBF302 Bijoy & Rajmohana, 2014 sp. n. Materials

Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ramesh Kumar; individualID: ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV.2652; individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; preparations: Card mount; Taxon: scientificNameID: Conostigmus neotubifer; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Megaspilidae; genus: Conostigmus; specificEpithet: neotubifer; scientificNameAuthorship: Bijoy and Rajmohana; Location: continent: Asia; island: Andaman and Nicobar island; country: India; stateProvince: Andaman and Nicobar island; locality: Port Blair; verbatimLocality: Bathu Barthi; decimalLatitude: 11.768 N; decimalLongitude: 92.737 E; Identification: identifiedBy: Bijoy and Rajmohana; dateIdentified: 06/27/2013; Event: habitat: grassy field; eventRemarks: collected in malasie trap; Record Level: institutionID: ZSIC

Type status: Paratype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ramesh Kumar; individualID: ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV.2653; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; preparations: Card mount; Taxon: scientificNameID: Conostigmus neotubifer; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; genus: Conostigmus; specificEpithet: neotubifer; scientificNameAuthorship: Bijoy and Rajmohana; Location: continent: Asia; island: Andaman and Nicobar island; country: India; stateProvince: Andaman and Nicobar island; locality: Port Blair; verbatimLocality: Bathu Barthi; decimalLatitude: 11.768 N; decimalLongitude: 92.737 E; Identification: identifiedBy: Bijoy and Rajmohana; dateIdentified: 06/27/2013; Event: habitat: grassy field; eventRemarks: collected in malasie trap; Record Level: institutionID: ZSIC

Type status: Paratype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ramesh Kumar; individualID: ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV.2654; individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; preparations: Card mount; Taxon: scientificNameID: Conostigmus neotubifer; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; genus: Conostigmus; specificEpithet: neotubifer; scientificNameAuthorship: Bijoy and Rajmohana; Location: continent: Asia; island: Andaman and Nicobar island; country: India; stateProvince: Andaman and Nicobar island; locality: Port Blair; verbatimLocality: Bathu Barthi; decimalLatitude: 11.768 N; decimalLongitude: 92.737 E; Identification: identifiedBy: Bijoy and Rajmohana; dateIdentified: 06/27/2013; Event: habitat: grassy field; eventRemarks: collected in malasie trap; Record Level: institutionID: ZSIC

Description

Holotype: Male (Fig. 1).

Coloration: Body blackish brown with head more darker; eyes and ocelli silvery with a bronze tinge; fore wing clear at base, with large infuscate area below pterostigma and radial vein extending to its posterior margin; scape, pedicel and A3 brownish yellow turning darker towards segments from A4 onwards; legs brownish yellow with coxae and posterior half of hind tibia blackish brown (Fig. 1); mandible light brown with darker distal extreme; pterostigma brown getting darker to wing margin; radial vein and costal vein pale brown (Fig. 8); body pubescence white.

Body: length: 1.52 mm.

Head: (length/width/height: 230/580/460); eye (length/width: 260/210); preoccipital crescent well-separated from posterior ocelli merging laterally into eye margin (Fig. 3); temple strongly carinated; preoccipital furrow present; ocellar triangle isosceles, narrow, short and raised; LOL < POL; hind ocelli remote from eye margin: POL/LOL/OOL: (80/40/110) Fig. 3. DFIm 57% of head width. Head 1.28 × wider than mesosoma (Fig. 5); facial sulcus present, extending to intertorular carina (Fig. 4); supraclypeal depression absent. Intertorular carina clear with a slightly elevated median peak (Fig. 3); ocular suture prominent and foveolate; eyes densely pubescent (Fig. 4); frons with sparse hairs; clypeus narrow and rectangular with angulated corners (Fig. 7); mandible long, bidendate, lower tooth distinctly longer than upper one.

Antenna: (Fig. 2); very long (subequal to the body length) and slender; scape nearly 4 × longer than wide; pedicel small and almost globular; A3 highly slender, nearly 4.8 × longer than wide, subequal to scape; flagellar segments quasi cylindrical with very slight serrations basally; pubescence shorter than breadth of segments; length/width measurements of antennal segments: scape (252/66), pedicel (60/48), A3 (255/53), A4 (147/54), A5 (140/53), A6 (122/53), A7 (128/61), A8 (117/64), A9 (108/57), A10 (82/70), A11 (127/54).

Mesosoma: (length/width/height: 610/450/460); mesosoma robust with very angular shoulders; alutaceous in sculpture; mesoscutum: (length/width: 230/440); mesoscutum nearly 2 × wider than long; lateral margin of mesoscutum posterior to anterior margin of notaulus convex; coarsely foveolate notaulices curve smoothly and converging posteriorly, meeting median furrow at transscutal articulation (Fig. 5); scutellum broadly rounded at apex with long hairs; axilliluar carinae present; metanotal-propodeal sulcus placed in regular intervals medially and with some longitudinal carina remote laterally (Fig. 9); propodeum unarmed, smooth and bare with sculpture effaced and with irregular carinae (Fig. 9) but stretched posteriorly into a inverted ‘U’ shaped narrow apex. Lateral propodeal carinae present. Propodeal spiracle large and conspicuous (Fig. 1); sternaulus absent (Fig. 6); anterior mesopleural sulcus and meso-metapleural sulcus distinct and foveolate; metapleuron bordered by incomplete carina; lower margin of mesopleuron and metapleuron with dense hairs.

Forewing: (Fig. 8); total wing length 1.25 mm. Pterostigma (length/width: 200/80) semielliptical, 2.4 × longer than wide. Radius (0.27 mm), slightly curved and 1.36 × the length of pterostigma; maximal width of fused costal and subcostal vein wider than radius; basal part with less hairs.

Metasoma: (Fig. 10); (length/width/height: 484/390/340); metasoma smooth; gastral collar well developed and widened more than that of propodeal strip, with syntergal translucent patch. Four strong transverse gastral carinae present on basal portion of metasoma. A pair of paler gastrocoeli seen quite below gastral collar; largest tergite, T3 occupying 72% of metasomal length. Metasoma held in an elevated manner, above propodeal plane (Fig. 1) (best visible in lateral view). Genitalia with short basal ring, volsella widely separated basaly with long terminal setae on each parossiculi (Fig. 15) (harpe damaged).

Female (Paratype)

Figs 11, 12, 13, 14.

Body length 1.68 mm. Body colouration and the morphological features of head, mesosoma and metasoma are the same as holotype, except the measurements of antennal segments, proportion of radius and pterostigma and length of metasoma.

Scape more than 4 × as long as wide and A3 more than 3 × as long as wide. Pedicel slender to succeeding antennal segments. Length/width measurements of antennal segments: scape (321/73), pedicel (103/51), A3 (170/51), A4 (97/65), A5 (86/79), A6 (83/90), A7 (90/87), A8 (79/84), A9 (80/85), A10 (87/78), A11 (124/68).

DFIm 52% of head width and fore wing infuscation much darker compared to paler infuscation in male fore wing. T3 occupying 57% of metasomal length.

Diagnosis

Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. can be diagnosed by the following features.

Head transverse, wider than mesosoma. Male antenna subequal to body length with A3 highly slender, 4.8 × as long as wide and subequal to scape. Flagellar segments in male quasi cylindrical with very slight serrations basally. Female antenna with scape more than 4 × as long as wide and A3 more than 3 × as long as wide. Ocellar triangle isosceles, narrow based, short and raised in both sexes. Facial sulcus extending to intertorular carina in both sexes. Preoccipital furrow distinct. Supraclypeal furrow absent. DFIm 0.57% of head width in male and 0.52% of head width in female. Eyes densely pubescent. Dorsal margin of propodeal foramen ‘U’ shaped in dorsal view; median propodeal projection absent. Sternaulus absent. Metasoma dorsally elevated from the propodeal axis. Forewing infuscus, darker in female and paler in male.

Biology

Unknown.

Etymology

The species is named 'neotubifer', since this species resembles Conostigmus tubifer ('Neo' in Latin = 'new').

Distribution

INDIA, Andaman Nicobar island, Port Blair.

Discussion

The proposed new species is placed under Conostigmus, since its putative sister Conostigmus tubifer belongs also to Conostigmus and can be justified mainly by the presence of independent parossiculi in male genitalia, one of the diagnostic characters for the subgenus Conostigmus s.str. in Dessart and Cancemi (1989). Conostigmus tubifer is unique among the Oriental species because of its affinity to Dendrocerus due to the quasi cylindrical appearance of male antennal segments, broad based nature of ocellar triangle (Dessart 1997), along with characters as mentioned (Table 1). Except in the ocellar ratio Conostigmus neotubifer resembles Conostigmus tubifer, in aspects regarding head, mesosoma and metasoma (Table 1) and also in having an upwardly elevated posture of metasoma. This intermixing of character states of the two genera Conostigmus and Dendrocerus in Conostigmus tubifer and Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. emphasizes the uncertain state of the current classification of Ceraphronoidea.

In Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n., OOL > POL (ocellar triangle is narrow based), while in Conostigmus tubifer OOL < POL (ocellar triangle is broad based). It needs special mention that the illustration No. 94, in page 87 and the description of Conostigmus tubifer in Dessart (1997), regarding ocelli, is a mismatch. In the description of the holotype male, Dessart clearly states, supported by numerical values, that the ocellar triangle is broad based, which is in contradiction to the medial placement of ocellar triangle in the illustration. As the holotype of Conostigmus tubifer could not be traced, we had no means than to go by the descriptive part of the original literature, since it is supported by numerical values. Though NHM is mentioned as the type depository of Conostigmus tubifer, in Johnson and Musetti (2004) and Dessart (1997), on enquiry at NHM, we were informed that the types were never deposited there in reality.

In addition, the differences in the following characters also ensure that Conostigmustubifer and Conostigmusneotubifer are not conspecific.

Forewing infuscation extending further to the distal margins beyond pterostigma and radius in Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. (restricted under stigma and radius in Conostigmus tubifer).

Facial groove distinct in both sexes in Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. (in Conostigmus tubifer facial groove present in male and absent in female).

Pterostigma is 2.4 × longer than wide in Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. (only 2 × longer than wide in Conostigmus tubifer).

DFIm value is 52% in female in Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. (46% in female in Conostigmus tubifer).

Scape and A3 of male subequal in length in Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. (in Conostigmus tubifer, A3 is shorter (only 0.85 ×) than scape).

In Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n., A3 of female antenna is 3 × longer than wide and scape 2 × longer than A3 (in Conostigmus tubifer, A3 is only two 2 × longer than wide and scape is 4 × longer than A3).

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Director of the Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata and the Officer-in-Charge, ZSI, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Calicut, Kerala, for providing facilities and encouragement. Thanks are also due to Istvan Miko for his valuable help in interpreting the generic limits of Conostigmus and Dendrocerus and also for literature support. We are grateful to David Notton, for checking the availability of the types at the Natural History Museum, London. The authors profusely thank Dr. J Poorani, for sharing specimens for this study.

Author contributions

Bijoy C: Identification, species concept and imaging

Rajmohana K: Identification and species concept

Ramesh Kumar: Specimen collection and manuscript preparation

References Dahlbom A. G. 1858 Svenska sma-ichneumonerans familijer och slagten. Ofvers. K. Vet. Akad. Forh. 14 289 298 Dessart P. 1995 Megaspilidae. Hanson P Gauld I. D. Eds Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford University Press Oxford 893 Dessart P. 1997 Les Megaspilidae ni europieens, ni americains 1. Le genre Conostigmus Dahlbom, 1858 (Hymenoptera Ceraphronoidea Megaspilidae). Mem. Soc. R. Belge Entomol. 37 144 Dessart P. Cancemi P. 1989 Trois especes nouvelles de Ceraphron a feutrage propodeal (Hymenoptera Ceraphronoidea Ceraphronidae). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 58 95 100 Fergusson N. D. M. 1980 A revision of the British species of Dendrocerus Ratzburg (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) with a review of their biology as aphid hyperparasites. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 41 255 314 Johnson N. F. Musetti L. 2004 Catalog of systematic literature of the super family Ceraphronoidea (Hymenoptera). 33(2) Contributions of the American Entomological institute 149 Miko I. Deans A. R. 2009 Masner, a new genus of Ceraphronidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea) described using controlled vocabularies Zookeys 20 127 153 10.3897/zookeys.20.119 Ratzeburg J. T. C. 1852 Die Ichneumonen der Forstinsecten in forstlicher und entomologischer Beziehung. 3 Nicolaischen Buchhandlung Berlin 272

Male habitus, lateral view.

Male antenna, lateral view.

Male head, dorsal view.

Male head, anterior view.

Male head and mesosoma, dorsal view.

Male mesosoma, lateral view.

Male clypeus, anterior view.

Male forewing.

Male propodeum.

Male, metasoma dorsal view.

Female habitus.

Female antenna.

Female forewing.

Female, metasoma dorsal view.

Male genitalia ventral view.

Characters for distinguishing Conostigmus and Dendrocerus.

Characters Conostigmus Dendrocerus Conostigmus neotubifer sp. n. Conostigmus tubifer
Ocellar triangle Usually with narrow base Usually with broad base Conostigmus Dendrocerus
Shape of head Usually globular Usually transverse Dendrocerus Dendrocerus
Intertorular carina Complete and with a median projection Complete or incomplete but without a median projection Conostigmus Conostigmus
Notauli Smoothly curved towards anterior angles of mesoscutum Sharply angulate towards anterior angles of mesoscutum Conostigmus Conostigmus
Mesoscutum Anteriorly narrowed Quadrate Dendrocerus Dendrocerus
Basal antennal segments of male Cylindrical Serrate, triangular, ramose or quasi cylindrical Quasi cylindrical as in Dendrocerus Quasi cylindrical as in Dendrocerus
Shape of scutellum Flat Convex or raised Conostigmus Conostigmus
Parossiculi Independent Fused Conostigmus Conostigmus