Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal BDJ 1314-2836 1314-2828 Pensoft Publishers Biodiversity Data Journal 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1061 3110 Taxonomic paper Ichneumonidae Systematics Asia Vietnam Review of the genus Metopheltes Uchida, 1932 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) with description of a new species from Vietnam Reshchikov Alexey Mr alexey.reshchikov@nrm.se http://zoobank.org/CB7D7449-FF41-4268-B594-D85D8032A91F van Achterberg Kees Prof http://zoobank.org/84D89383-D4B3-4E6D-8DDE-64AF90AD3AB5 Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Corresponding author: Alexey Reshchikov (alexey.reshchikov@nrm.se).

Academic editor: Dominique Zimmermann.

2014 05 03 2014 2 e1061 27 01 2014 04 03 2014 Alexey Reshchikov, Kees van Achterberg This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://zoobank.org/96AA6B0F-1259-470D-A5F7-D5187B5D3353

A new species of the genus Metopheltes Uchida (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. is described from Vietnam. Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 is recorded for the first time from the Russian Far East. The other previously described species are also illustrated and discussed.

Ctenopelmatinae Perilissini Metopheltes Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. Metopheltes chinensis (Morley, 1913) Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 Vietnam Russian Far East Martin-fellowship at the Naturalis
Introduction

The genus Metopheltes was described as a monotypic genus by Toichi Uchida in 1932, with Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 from Japan as the type species (Uchida 1932). It was placed in the tribe Perilissini of the subfamily Ctenopelmatinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) and is considered to be closely related to the genus Opheltes Holmgren, 1859. But twenty years before another species of this genus, Metopheltes chinensis (Morley, 1913) was discovered from China and placed within the genus Opheltes (Morley 1913). It was transferred to the genus Metopheltes by Henry Townes (Townes et al. 1965).

The members of the genus are rather rare as well as Ctenopelmatinae in general in the Oriental region. This species-rich subfamily includes mostly koinobiont endoparasitoids of sawfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) and is more diverse in temperate than tropical zones as the primary host groups are relatively scarce in tropical habitats (Gauld 1997, Veijalainen et al. 2012). We know 60 species of Ctenopelmatinae recorded from the Oriental region, mostly China, while in contrast 757 species are known from the Western Palaearctic (Yu et al. 2012). On the other hand sawfly diversity in South East Asia is expected to be rather high (Wei and Niu 2009) and the history of Ctenopelmatinae research in this region is rather recent when compared with Europe.

Nothing is known about the biology of Metopheltes. However species of the closely related (see Diagnosis) genus Opheltes were reared from large-bodied sawflies of the genera Cimbex Olivier, 1790 and Agenocimbex Rohwer, 1910 (Hymenoptera, Cimbicidae) (Aubert 2000, Giraud and Laboulbène 1877, Sheng et al. 2004, Townes 1945, Townes et al. 1965, Uchida 1928, Uchida 1930, Ulbricht 1909, Zirngiebl 1961). Hosts of Metopheltes members could be expected within cimbicid sawflies associated with deciduous trees. Here we provide a detailed up-to-date diagnosis of the genus and a description of a new species (Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. from Vietnam) is added. Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 is recorded for the first time from Russian Far East.

Materials and methods

The specimen of Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. was collected with a Malaise trap in the Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam) in 2000 (Fig. 1). The biotope was a small piece of disturbed lowland rainforest on limestone just inside the park and about 1 km from the headquarter buildings. The holotype of the new species is deposited in the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden (RMNH). We also studied specimens of Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 from the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University (ZMUM) and the Smithsonian Institution (USNM) and Opheltes glaucopterus (Linnaeus 1758) from the Swedish Museum of Natural History (NHRS). The only known specimen of Metopheltes chinensis which is actually the type was not available for examination due to a loan policy of the British Museum of Natural History (BMNH) and we had to use photos. The morphological terminology follows Gauld (Gauld 1997). Photographs of the specimens, excluding Metopheltes chinensis, were taken with a Canon EOS 7D digital camera and combined using Zerene®.

Taxon treatments Metopheltes Uchida, 1932 Metopheltes Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 – Uchida 1932 Diagnosis

Metopheltes shares several character states with Opheltes: the presence of a thyridium on the second tergite of the metasoma (Fig. 2c), the absence of a distinct tyloid on the basal flagellomere and a deep groove extending the full length of the mesopleuron (Fig. 3c) (Townes 1970). This mesopleural character is not unique within Perilissini and occurs also in Priopoda impressa Reshchikov, 2012 (Reshchikov 2012) and some Westwoodiini (Wharton et al. 2010). Unlike Opheltes (Fig. 4a) the second maxillary palpomere is not modified in Metopheltes (Fig. 2d) while the frontal carina (a character state previously found only in Opheltes) is present in Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. (Fig. 3b), though less developed. Metopheltes also differs from Opheltes by the shape of the propodeum in lateral view: the basal part rounded (elevated at an acute angle in Opheltes); its apical part comparatively elongate and the apical transverse carina not elevated (Figs 2a, 4b). The median apical ligulate process of the last visible sternite of male is notched apically and laterally (Fig. 5f). The tip of the aedeagus is bent over and ends in an adze-like blade.

Metopheltes chinensis (Morley, 1913) Opheltes chinensis Morley, 1913 – Morley 1913: 135. Materials

Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Fortune; individualCount: 1; sex: male; Location: country: China; Event: eventDate: 1854; Record Level: institutionCode: BMNH

Distribution

China.

Notes

This species is represented by a single male specimen. In the original description (Morley 1913) the type locality is not clearly mentioned, and the label data is poor, "a single male in British Museum is labelled "Northern China", but was more probably taken about Shanghai, by Mr. Fortune." (Morley 1913). However photos of the type specimen (Fig. 6) allow one to distinguish this species from closely related Metopheltes petiolaris. In future if more representative material of Metopheltes can be collected it will be possible to clarify the status of this species and provide an identification key for the group.

Metopheltes clypeoarmatus urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BB674DDC-E6FB-4E0D-9A6A-60CF17DB5C4A Reshchikov & Achterberg sp. n. Materials

Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Mai Phu Quy; individualCount: 1; sex: female; Location: country: Vietnam; stateProvince: Ninh Binh; verbatimLocality: Cuc Phuong N.P., near entrance, c. 225 m; Event: samplingProtocol: Malaise trap; eventDate: 14.iv.-1.v.2000; Record Level: institutionCode: RMNH

Description

Body length 11 mm. Antennal flagellum with 34 segments. Width to length ratio of scapus 0.5 (Fig. 3a). First flagellomere 3 times as long as wide, without distinct tyloid. Head not narrowed behind the eyes, temple rounded. Maximal length of temple 1.3 times transverse eye diameter; minimal length of temple equal to transverse eye diameter. Face as wide as longitudinal eye diameter; moderately convex, bulging; matt; densely and shallowly punctate, densely pubescent. Frontal carina between eye and antennal socket present (Fig. 3b). Clypeus flat, very slightly separated from face by a shallow impression; apical margin of clypeus moderately obtuse and serrate. Posterior ocellus separated from eye by 2.5 times maximum diameter of ocellus. Tentorial pits large (Fig. 3a). Width of malar space 0.3 times of basal width of mandible. Lower mandible tooth longer than upper one. Second maxillary palpomere not modified (Fig. 2d). Hypostomal carina joining occipital carina well above base of mandible (Fig. 2d). Occipital carina complete.

Mesosoma matt, punctate, with sparse yellowish setae. Notauli not impressed. Epicnemial carina raised at lower part of mesopleuron, not reaching anterior margin of mesopleuron, terminating dorsally in rounded transverse ridge that sharply delimits a median longitudinal furrow extending across middle of mesopleuron. Mesopleuron matt, densely and shallowly punctate, with deep groove extending full length of mesopleuron (Fig. 3c). First tibia with an apical tooth. Apical margin of mid tibia without distinct tooth similar to that on fore tibia. Posterior hind tibial spur at least 11 times longer than its maximum basal width. Tarsal claws pectinate with comparatively short teeth (Fig. 2e). Areolet of fore wing petiolate. Radius leaving pterostigma little before its middle. Second recurrent vein with two bullae. Nervulus postfurcal. Nervellus intercepted above its middle. Propodeal carinae complete, strongly raised, except basal part of dorso-median longitudinal carina; apical transverse carina curved towards metasoma; area superomedia trapezoidal and as long as wide (Fig. 3d).

Metasoma slightly shiny, smooth, sparsely pubescent. First metasomal tergite 0.4 times wider than its length (Fig. 2b); slightly prominent dorsally in profile; without shallow median longitudinal impression; only basally bordered by lateral longitudinal carinae. Second metasomal tergite with thyridium (Fig. 2c). Apical metasomal segments compressed laterally. Ovipositor straight, as long as height of last tergite, without notch and nodus apically, swollen basally (Fig. 2f).

Colour. Body yellowish-red (Figs 2, 3, 7). Mandible black apically (Fig. 3a). Apical part of antennal flagellum, hind tibia and tarsus reddish. Pterostigma brown. Fore wing very slightly infuscate apically.

Diagnosis

This species differs from other two members of Metopheltes by the following combination of character states: first flagellomere shorter (3.0 times as long as wide) than in Metopheltes petiolaris (6.0 times as long as wide) and Metopheltes chinensis (4.0 times as long as wide Fig. 6b clypeus); clypeus apically serrate (Fig. 3a); tentorial pits large (Fig. 3a); clypeus flat, very slightly separated from face by a shallow impression; posterior ocellus separated from eye by 2.5 times its maximum diameter (1.7 times in two other species Fig. 6a); frontal carina between eye and antennal socket present (Fig. 3b); upper hind part of mesopleuron polished and smooth (Figs 3c, 5a; punctate in Metopheltes petiolaris); apical margin of middle tibia without distinct tooth similar to that on fore tibia; posterior hind tibial spur at least 11.0 times longer than maximum basal width (6.0–7.0 times in Metopheltes petiolaris); hind femur and tibia 4.8 and 7.0 times as long as wide, respectively, (10.0 and 11.0 times in Metopheltes petiolaris); tarsal claws shorter and pectinate with comparatively short teeth (Figs 2e, 5d); areolet petiolate; radius leaving pterostigma only little before its middle; propodeum more precipitous (Fig. 2a) than in Metopheltes petiolaris (Fig. 5c), its carinae complete (Fig. 3d) and strongly raised (except basal part of dorso-median longitudinal carina; only area apicalis defined in Metopheltes petiolaris (Fig. 5b) and Metopheltes chinensis (Fig. 6c); first metasomal tergite (Fig. 2b) 0.4 times wider than long (0.6 times in Metopheltes petiolaris or Metopheltes chinensis Fig. 6dchinensis); ovipositor without notch and nodus apically, (ovipositor with shallow notch and weak nodus in Metopheltes petiolaris Figs 2f, 5e).

Etymology

The species epithet clypeoarmatus refers to the serrate apical margin of the clypeus.

Distribution

N. Vietnam.

Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932 Materials

Type status: Other material. Occurrence: recordedBy: T. Fukai; individualCount: 1; sex: female; Location: country: Japan; stateProvince: Wakasa; Record Level: institutionCode: USNM

Type status: Other material. Occurrence: recordedBy: A. Zhelokhovtsev; individualCount: 1; sex: female; Location: country: Russia; stateProvince: Primorsky Krai; verbatimLocality: Spassk-Dalny; Event: eventDate: 17.vi.1961; Record Level: institutionCode: ZMUM

Type status: Other material. Occurrence: recordedBy: A. Romanov; individualCount: 1; sex: male; Location: country: Russia; stateProvince: Primorsky Krai; verbatimLocality: around Vladivostok; Event: eventDate: 28.vi.1940; Record Level: institutionCode: ZMUM

Type status: Other material. Occurrence: recordedBy: A. Rasnitsyn; individualCount: 2; sex: male; Location: country: Russia; stateProvince: Primorsky Krai; verbatimLocality: Khasansky District, Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve; Event: eventDate: 6.vi.1962; Record Level: institutionCode: ZMUM

Diagnosis

This species differs from the other two members of Metopheltes by the following combination of character states: first flagellomere longer (6.0 times as long as wide) than in other species; ventrally clypeus not serrate; posterior ocellus separated from eye by 1.7 times its maximum diameter; frontal carina between eye and antennal socket absent; upper hind part of mesopleuron punctate; apical margin of middle tibia with distinct tooth similar to that on fore tibia; posterior hind tibial spur at least 6.0 times longer than maximum basal width; hind femur and tibia 10.0 and 11.0 times as long as wide, respectively; tarsal claws long and pectinate with long teeth (Fig. 5c); propodeum acclivous (Fig. 5c), not precipitous like in Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n. (Fig. 2a), its carinae incomplete, only area apicalis defined (Fig. 5b); first metasomal tergite 0.6 times wider than long; ovipositor with shallow notch and weak nodus.

Distribution

Japan, Russian Far East (first record).

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Frederique Bakker (RMNH), Dr. Robert Kula (USNM) and Dr. Alexander Andropov (ZMUM) for kindly supplying specimens, Dr. Gavin Broad (BMNH) for his kind help in providing photos of the type specimens of Metopheltes chinensis (Morley, 1913) and checking of style of text, Dr. Jose Fernandez-Triana (CNC), Dr. Jon Gelhaus (The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, USA) and one reviewer for helpful suggestions on manuscript. This study was supported by a Martin Fellowship from the Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Leiden).

References Aubert J. F. 2000 Les ichneumonides oeust–palearctiques et leurs hotes. 3. Scolobatinae (=Ctenopelmatinae) et suppl. aux volumes precedents Litterae Zoologicae 5 1 310 Gauld I. D. 1997 The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 2 57 Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 485 Giraud Joseph-Étienne Laboulbène Alexandre 1877 Liste des éclosions d'insects observées par le Dr Joseph-Étienne Giraud... recueillie et annotée par M. le Dr Alexandre Laboulbène Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 5 7 397 436 Morley C. 1913 A revision of the Ichneumonidae based on the collection in the British Museum (Natural History) with descriptions of new genera and species. Part II. Tribes Rhyssides, Echthromorphides, Anomalides and Paniscides British Museum London 140 https://archive.org/details/revisionofichneu02morl Reshchikov Alexey 2012 Priopoda Holmgren, 1856 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from Nepal with a key to the Oriental and Eastern Palaearctic species Zootaxa 3478 133 142 Sheng Mao Ling Wu Xing Yu Luo You Qing 2004 On the ichneumonids parasitizing Agenocimbex elmina (Hymenoptera) in Gansu, China Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 29 3 549 552 Chinese Townes Henry Momoi Setsuya Townes Marjorie 1965 Catalogue and reclassification of the eastern Palearctic Ichneumonidae Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 5 1 661 Townes H. K. 1945 A catalogue and reclassification of the Nearctic Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera), Part 2. The subfamilies Mesoleiinae, Plectiscinae, Orthocentrinae, Diplazontinae, Metopiinae, Ophioninae, Mesochorinae Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 11 478 925 Townes H. K. 1970 The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. 13 Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 307 Uchida T. 1928 Zweiter Beitrag zur Ichneumoniden-Fauna Japans Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University 21 177 297 Uchida T. 1930 Vierter Beitrag zur Ichneumoniden-Fauna Japans Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University 25 243 298 Uchida T. 1932 Sauter’s Formosa-Ausbeute. Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University 33 133 222 Ulbricht A. 1909 Beitrage zur Insekten-Fauna des Niederrheins. Ichneumoniden der Umgegend Mitteilungen des Vereins fur Naturkunde zu Krefeld 1909 1 40 Veijalainen A. Sääksjärvi I. E. Erwin T. L. Gomez I. Longino J. T. 2012 Subfamily composition of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) from western Amazonia: Insights into diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps. Insect Conservation and Diversity 2012 1 10 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00185.x Wei M. Niu G. 2009 Review of some Southeast Asian sawfly species (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) described by Attila Haris Zootaxa 2279 60 68 Wharton Robert Cammack Jonathan Mullins Patricia 2010 A revision of the westwoodiine genus Pergaphaga (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae) ZooKeys 37 35 68 http://www.pensoft.net/journal_home_page.php?journal_id=1&page=article&type=show&article_id=313&abstract=1 10.3897/zookeys.37.313 Yu D. S. van Achterberg K. Horstmann K. 2012 World Ichneumonoidea 2011. Taxonomy, Biology, Morphology and Distribution 1111 1111 Zirngiebl L. 1961 Über Parasiten an Blattwespen Mitteilungen der Pollichia 8 193 197

Distribution of Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n.

Holotype female Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n.

Propodeum in profile.

First metasomal tergite.

Second metasomal tergite.

Second maxillary palpomere.

Tarsal claw.

Ovipositor.

Holotype female Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n.

Face.

Frontal carina.

Mesopleuron.

Propodeum in dorsal view.

Opheltes glaucopterus (Linnaeus, 1758).

Second maxillary palpomere.

Propodeum in profile.

Metopheltes petiolaris Uchida, 1932.

Mesopleuron, female.

Propodeum in dorsal view, female.

Propodeum in profile, female.

Tarsal claw, female.

Ovipositor, female.

Last visible sternite, male.

Holotype male Metopheltes chinensis (Morley, 1913).

Face.

Head in dorsoposterior view.

Propodeum.

First metasomal tergite.

Holotype female Metopheltes clypeoarmatus sp. n., habitus in lateral view.