Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Journal BDJ 1314-2836 1314-2828 Pensoft Publishers Biodiversity Data Journal 10.3897/BDJ.1.e984 2028 Angiospermae Basal Angiosperms: Monocots Poales Cyperaceae Plantae Bioinformatics Identification Key(s) Systematics Cenozoic Europe Americas Asia Australasia A visual identification key utilizing both gestalt and analytic approaches to identification of Carices present in North America (Plantae, Cyperaceae) Jones Timothy Mark Dr tjone54@tigers.lsu.edu 1 Reznicek Anton (Tony) Dr reznicek@umich.edu Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 2 Matson Steve Mr ssmat@sbcglobal.net Potential reviewer Colleague / Friend 3 Urbatsch Lowell E. Dr leu@lsu.edu Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Copy editor Mentor 1 Chakrabarty Prosanta Dr prosanta@lsu.edu Linguistic editor Copy editor Mentor 1 Brylinski Michal Dr mbrylinski@lsu.edu Linguistic editor Copy editor Mentor 1 Brown Jeremy Dr jembrown@lsu.edu Linguistic editor Copy editor Mentor 1 Thiele Kevin Dr kevin.thiele@dpaw.wa.gov.au Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 4 Thomas William Wayt Dr wthomas@nybg.org Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 5 Barkworth Mary E Dr mary.barkworth@usu.edu Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 6 Thomas Wayt Dr wwaytt@gmail.com Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 5 Walters Terrence Dr terrence.w.walters@aphis.usda.gov Linguistic editor Colleague / Friend Potential reviewer Copy editor Mentor 7 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States of America University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America University of California, Berkeley, United States of America Director of Western Australian Herbarium, Perth, Australia New York Botanical Garden, New York, United States of America Utah State University, Logan, United States of America USDA APHIS, Ft. Collins, United States of America

Corresponding author: Timothy Mark Jones (tjone54@tigers.lsu.edu).

Academic editor: Thomas Couvreur

2013 16 9 2013 1 e984 7 8 2013 13 9 2013 Timothy Mark Jones This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Images are a critical part of the identification process because they enable direct, immediate and relatively unmediated comparisons between a specimen being identified and one or more reference specimens. The Carices Interactive Visual Identification Key (CIVIK) is a novel tool for identification of North American Carex species, the largest vascular plant genus in North America, and two less numerous closely-related genera, Cymophyllus and Kobresia. CIVIK incorporates 1288 high-resolution tiled image sets that allow users to zoom in to view minute structures that are crucial at times for identification in these genera. Morphological data are derived from the earlier Carex Interactive Identification Key (CIIK) which in turn used data from the Flora of North America treatments. In this new iteration, images can be viewed in a grid or histogram format, allowing multiple representations of data. In both formats the images are fully zoomable.

Visual key identification Carex Cymophyllus Kobresia interactive identification sedges Louisiana State University
Introduction

The last ten years may be remembered for the rebirth of plant taxonomy and systematics in a new guise, computational biodiversity informatics. For much of the earth, and North America in particular, botanical information that once required substantial effort to acquire is now reliably provided in seconds by such websites as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Flora of North America, Missouri Botanical Garden\'s Tropicos, Encyclopedia of Life, United States Plants Database, and emerging regional herbarium networks. Plant biodiversity is now literally at everyone’s fingertips.

State of the art plant identification systems

Traditional biological identification systems today are of two primary types; analytic and gestalt (K. Thiele, pers. comm. 2013). Two forms of analytic keys commonly used today are dichotomous and interactive matrix-based keys. Both are primarily text-based question systems that can yield static images upon the final determination. Conversely, gestalt keys, use an identifiable image of the organism in question. Similar to what is seen in field guides.

Analytic matrix-based keys are considered to be state of the art today The University Of Queensland 2006 due to their ability to scale up across hundreds of taxa. To use, users select characters to achieve a determination of the unknown taxon using a four-panel informational interface. The information panels often represented are \'characters available\', \'characters chosen\', \'entities available\', and entities discarded\'. Within this format, it is possible to insert thumbnail-sized, static images to accompany the text if the taxa numbers are relatively small (< 100). But when taxa numbers are higher (>100), their inclusion results in the information panel becoming too long to be usable, e.g. the Carices used here would require copious scrolling across its many meters of length.

Visual keys borrow from both gestalt and analytic methods. They use character matrices for initial pruning of the image set analytically. After a few characters choices the many hundreds of small images are reduced to a manageable set of bigger images. Now gestalt methods take over as the images become larger and truly informative. With this hybrid of functionality, featuring the best of both gestalt and analysis, a novel identification method is created that can cater to the neophyte as well as the expert.

<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Carex</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Kobresia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cymophyllous</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: a model for scalability

Carex is the largest vascular plant genus in North America (Ball and Reznicek 2002). With two closely related genera, Kobresia and Cymophyllus, it forms the Carices of North America; all three are members of the family Cyperaceae, commonly called sedges but often erroneously referred to as grasses. These three genera share a number of basic morphological characteristics including having linear leaves and a fruit enclosed in a bag-like structure called a perigynium. All have small flowers that lack large, colorful petals and sepals. Plus they share one other important characteristic: they are difficult to identify. Nevertheless, they are morphologically distinct and relatively easily recognizable as a group.

The new visual key

The data used in this project are primarily derived from an interactive identification program to Carex that has been online since 2006 at both Utah State University and Louisiana State University (http://www.herbarium.lsu.edu/keys/carex/carex.html). During this time it has been consistently revised and is currently in version 21. (Suppl. materials 3, 4). Web statistics have been tracked from 2007. Data show that numerous individuals worldwide, government agencies, students in classrooms, and participants in identification workshops have repeatedly used the keys. Many users have graciously suggested revisions and clarifications that have increased their usability and performance. The key presented here reflects contributions from several individuals, innumerable field trips, and countless hours in herbaria both identifying and imaging specimens. It is only with such collaboration and effort that an image key to such a large genus can be created.

Goals

My goal in this project was to create an easy to use identification resource that maximized the value of high resolution images while enabling users to explore the distribution of morphological diversity within the genera. Query-able images. For example, to answer questions such as: how are species with trigonous achenes geographically distributed across Canada by province or territory? How common are species with two-sided achenes in species with leaf blades more than 10 mm wide? These sorts of hypotheses are easily answered in histogram mode Fig. 4. Because for the first time, side-by-side image comparisons are possible across species permitting comparative examination and discrimination among closely-related members of any complex, of which there are many, within the Carices. CIVIK is seen here: http://www.herbarium2.lsu.edu/aba/

Development of visual identification tool Study area description

This key is designed for use in North America, including Mexico. The original descriptive data was derived from Flora of North America (Ball and Reznicek 2002) and (Mackenzie 1940). My images come from fieldwork focused in eastern North America while other individuals have contributed images from other locations across North America.

Design description

1. IMAGES

1.1. Contributors

Steve Matson and Tony Reznicek both sent a DVD copy of their Carex field images. Lowell Urbatsch contributed his teaching-microscopy-images (http://www.herbarium.lsu.edu/keys/eee/b52.html). My images were collected from many field sites primarily in the north-eastern United States. The New York Botanical Garden Press granted the use of the plates of both North American Cariceae volumes (Mackenzie 1940). The remaining images were found on the World Wide Web (WWW) and their owners (Forest Starr, Kim Starr, Nhy Nyugen, Ann Debolt) contacted by email to request permission for their use. The remaining image contributor, Robert Mohlenbrock, had made the image used here available on http://www.plants.usda.gov/ so it could be used without seeking permission.

1.2. Processing of images

To manage the large image numbers (e.g., Matson hundreds of images; Jones, many thousands), each set of images from each owner was segregated on a local drive. Predictably, across this many image contributors, naming conventions differed greatly, thus significant renaming of image files was required. The basic convention used was to include the taxon name, type of image, and the author in the file name. Another issue of note was the fact that many of these images had been prepared for delivery via the WWW, and had been re-sized. Larger file sizes were selected for inclusion while those that were originally designed as thumbnails were not used. Rarely, older images that were scanned from slides were either cropped or otherwise manipulated with Photoshop CS 3. Lastly, rotation of images for appropriate orientation was also often required.

1.2.1 Image sizes

Image sizes are variable and range from 40 K to over 13 MB. Line drawings and most images by Jones are at 2848 × 4288 with a maximal bit depth of 24. Matson\'s images were more variable as some images had been prepared for web use. They range from 2592 × 3888 to 550 × 689 with variable bit depths. Other contributed images are of intermediate sizes.

1.3. Imaging of Mackenzie\'s plates

New York Botanical Garden Press gave permission to image the plates in K. K. Mackenzie\'s two volume treatment of Carices of North America (Mackenzie 1940) for use in this project. All plates were imaged with a traditional copy stand, using a Nikon 300D camera with a 1:1 macro lens, and two halogen desk lamps for illumination using JPEG format. All images required batch-processing in Photoshop CS3 for color and a minor defect in skew. Additionally, to limit total file size of the project, the images were reduced to approximately one megabyte from three megabytes by resizing.

2. DATA FOR CXML CREATION

2.1. Primary data via export

The dataset was derived from an export of CIIK (http://www.herbarium.lsu.edu/keys/carex/carex.html) in comma separated values (CSV) from LUCID 3.4 Identification Software (The University Of Queensland 2006). These data were the template for the new secondary dataset (Fig. 1). The exported data were imported into Excel 2010 and the Excel PivotViewer plug-in generated the Commerce eXtensible Markup Language (CXML) version of the data (Suppl. material 1). This plugin has since been deprecated in favor of a command line tool, Pauthor (Microsoft 2010a, Microsoft 2010b).

2.2. Dependent software

.NET Framework (Microsoft 2007)

Visual Studio 2010 / 2012

Silverlight 4 Tools for Visual Studio 2010

Silverlight Software Development Kit (SDK)

Silverlight 4 Toolkit

PivotViewer SDK

2.3. Interface considerations in a micro-ontology

In Pivot Viewer with the Silverlight 4 format, the characters and states (C&S) are located in the searchable information pane on left, with the displayable information pane on right. This left pane is of a fixed width, lacking word-wrapping functions (Fig. 2). If all C&S information data mined were used, extensive scrolling would be required and thereby reduce the usability of the key. For this reason, long text strings in the C&S were edited for brevity. A \'less is more\' approach was taken, with C&S being restricted to those that would be appropriate in an ontology.

2.4. Clustering issues in the graphical mode require a “normalization character state”

*Visual keys require a normalization character state; or the image numbers must be standardized for graphical display*

If image numbers between species are not consistent, a representative or semantic image is required. This leading image permits true one-to-one comparisons over any number of taxa. Without it, accurate representations of the data would be obscured due to clustering. For this reason, only those taxa with a line drawing are presented here to allow for a one-to-one comparison across taxa. It was done early in development as a work-around to the differing number of images per taxon problem. Later unpublished works of this type deal with this issue in multiple ways (see \'Additional information\').

To use this normalization feature, select ‘Image by’ at the base of the left information pane, then select ‘Mackenzie, K. K.’ from the information panel. Now, only grey scale images are used in a portrait format with an attention to the aspect ratio. All images are presented in the same fashion and uniformity in a grey scale that is easy to visually interpret. This ad-hoc commitment to Mackenzie\'s species list was done for this reason.

2.5. Data and images together

Images were added in small batches in a new Excel file. Character data were copy-pasted from the secondary spreadsheet to the third instance of Excel to form the final building file across multiple monitors.

2.6. Tertiary data

The completed third spreadsheet is now run using the \'New collection tool\' by selecting its icon in the ribbon panel of Excel. It generates two primary products; image tiles in numerous folders and a CXML file (Suppl. material 1). The control leverages Deepzoom technology (Microsoft 2008) to create a deep zoom image library (DZI) and deep zoom collection files (DZC) like those seen on Google or Bing maps (Fig. 3). This geometric series of images supports the zoom-ability of images. As the user zooms in, things get geometrically resolved without the penalty associated with a large image download. As users pan through a collection, they can see only what they desire.

2.6.1 Issues completing tertiary data for image tiles and CXML

Hardware and software issues were experienced at all stages. Testing revealed that while tiling a few hundred high resolution images with PivotViewer is manageable, using over a thousand high-resolution images made Excel unstable. Memory allocation as well as the processor spiking issues - limited development time and resulted in extended periods of waiting for test builds overnight or on a build across many days. The creation of the image tiles is best attempted with a state-of-the-art computer with a solid state drive. CIVIK total tile-set and cxml build-time was approximately 12 hours for the final presented build (Fig. 4).

3. Deployable image tiles sizes

The DZI files are nearly four gigabytes in file size and comprise over 250,000 image-tile files in over 18,000 folders with an associated CXML of 3.3 megabytes in size. A Silverlight application package (XAP) file is also required to drive the application.

4. Compile with Visual Studio

To compile with Visual Studio, open a new instance of a Silverlight application for the web in Visual Studio. Now add the references to PivotViewer on the main Extensible Application Markup Language (XAML) page in UserControl. Then add the URL to the CXML file to the XAML.CS code behind file. Then, build or compile the deployment package for placement on the server.

4.1 XAML and XAML.CS Code behind Files

See \'software technical features\'

5. Deploy to web server

Ensure that the following Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) types are configured on server; significant development time was lost due to one of these settings not being in place.

• CXML - text/xml

• DZC - text/xml

• DZI - text/xml

6. History of Use

CIVIKhas been tracked via Google Analytics with the other later works of visual types. These combined works reveal that 13,933 visits occurred from 116 countries in 2464 cities over a three year period. An average dwell time of two minutes across the three works of type is seen here. (See Additional information and Suppl. material 6).

7. Considerations and discussion

While Silverlight is ideal for this data format, it will be deprecated (see http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifean45) as no future versions are scheduled for release. It will, however, be supported for ten years which will aid future works of this kind. Thankfully, HTML 5 versions are also now available for PivotViewer that enable the CXML format across all devices in a device agnostic fashion. This cross platform capability is exciting as it does not require the Silverlight runtime, so phone and tablets are enabled as well with HTML 5. HTML 5 versions have one other important advantage - a Google translate function is easily added in minutes to over 70 languages (see http://translate.google.com/about/). Opening the door to future iterations of high-resolution images supported by text that is translatable.

Funding

SLouisiana State University

Geographic coverage

Description: The identification key can be used for species occurring in United States, Canada, and Mexico. Several species have a much wider distribution, hence the key has some value in other regions as well.

Coordinates: 90 and 15 Latitude; -180 and -45 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage
Scientific Name Common Name Rank
Carex sedge genus
Kobresia sedge genus
Cymophyllus sedge genus
Carex abrupta Mack. abruptbeak sedge species
Carex abscondita Mack. thicket sedge species
Carex adusta Boott lesser brown sedge species
Carex aestivalis M.A. Curtis ex A. Gray summer sedge species
Carex aggregata Mack. glomerate sedge species
Carex alata Torr. broadwing sedge species
Carex albicans Willd. ex Spreng. whitetinge sedge species
Carex albonigra Mack. blackandwhite sedge species
Carex albursina E. Sheld. white bear sedge species
Carex alligata Boott Hawai\'i sedge species
Carex alma L.H. Bailey sturdy sedge species
Carex alopecoidea Tuck. Foxtail sedge species
Carex amphibola Steud. eastern narrowleaf sedge species
Carex amplectens Mack. claspbract sedge species
Carex amplifolia Boott bigleaf sedge species
Carex annectens (E.P. Bicknell) E.P. Bicknell yellowfruit sedge species
Carex anthoxanthea J. Presl & C. Presl grassyslope arctic sedge species
Carex aperta Boott Columbian sedge species
Carex aquatilis Wahlenb. water sedge species
Carex arapahoensis Clokey Arapaho sedge species
Carex arcta Boott northern cluster sedge species
Carex arctata Boott drooping woodland sedge species
Carex arenaria L. sand sedge species
Carex arkansana (L.H. Bailey) L.H. Bailey Arkansas sedge species
Carex assiniboinensis W. Boott Assiniboia sedge species
Carex atherodes Spreng. wheat sedge species
Carex athrostachya Olney slenderbeak sedge species
Carex atlantica L. H. Bailey prickly bog sedge species
Carex atrata L. black scale sedge species
Carex atratiformis Britton scrabrous black sedge species
Carex atrofusca Schkuhr darkbrown sedge species
Carex atrosquama Mack. lesser blackscale sedge species
Carex aurea Nutt. golden sedge species
Carex austrina Mack. southern sedge species
Carex austrocaroliniana L.H. Bailey tarheel sedge species
Carex aztecica Mack. Aztec sedge species
Carex backii Boott Back\'s sedge species
Carex baileyi Britton Bailey\'s sedge species
Carex baltzellii Chapm. Baltzell\'s sedge species
Carex barrattii Torr. ex Schwein. Barratt\'s sedge species
Carex bebbii (L. H. Bailey) Olney ex Fernald Bebb\'s sedge species
Carex bella L.H. Bailey southwestern showy sedge species
Carex bicknellii Britton & A.Br. Bicknell\'s sedge species
Carex bicolor Bellardi ex All. two-color sedge species
Carex bigelowii Torr. ex Schwein. Bigelow\'s sedge species
Carex biltmoreana Mack. stiff sedge species
Carex blanda Dewey eastern woodland sedge species
Carex bolanderi Olney Bolander\'s sedge species
Carex boliviensis Van Heurck & Müll. Arg. Bolivian sedge species
Carex breweri Boott Brewer\'s sedge species
Carex brizoides L. species
Carex bromoides Willd. brome-like sedge species
Carex brunnescens (Pers.) Poir. brownish sedge species
Carex bullata Willd. button sedge species
Carex bushii Mack. Bush\'s sedge species
Carex buxbaumii Wahlenb. Buxbaum\'s sedge species
Carex californica L.H. Bailey California sedge species
Carex canescens L. silvery sedge species
Carex capillaris L. hair-like sedge species
Carex capitata Sol. capitate sedge species
Carex careyana Torr. ex Dewey Carey\'s sedge species
Carex caroliniana Schwein. Carolina sedge species
Carex caryophyllea Latourr. vernal sedge species
Carex castanea Wahlenb. chestnut sedge species
Carex cephaloidea (Dewey) Dewey ex Boott thinleaf sedge species
Carex cephalophora Muhl. ex Willd. oval-leaf sedge species
Carex cherokeensis Schwein. Cherokee sedge species
Carex chihuahuensis Mack. Chihuahuan sedge species
Carex chordorrhiza L. creeping sedge species
Carex circinnata C.A.Mey. coiled sedge species
Carex collinsii Nutt. Collins\' sedge species
Carex communis L.H. Bailey fibrousroot sedge species
Carex comosa Boott longhair sedge species
Carex complanata Torr. & Hook. hirsute sedge species
Carex concinna R. Br. low northern sedge species
Carex concinnoides Mack. northwestern sedge species
Carex conjuncta Boott soft fox sedge species
Carex conoidea Willd. openfield sedge species
Carex crawei Dewey ex Torr. Crawe\'s sedge species
Carex crawfordii Fernald Craweford\'s sedge species
Carex crebriflora Wiegand coastal plain sedge species
Carex crinita Lam. fringed sedge species
Carex cristatella Britton & A.Br. crested sedge species
Carex crus-corvi Shuttlew. ex Kunze ravenfoot sedge species
Carex cryptolepis Mack. northeastern sedge species
Carex cumulata (L.H. Bailey) Mack. clustered sedge species
Carex cusickii Mack. Cusick\'s sedge species
Carex dasycarpa Muhl. sandywoods sedge species
Carex davisii Schwein. & Torr. Davis\' sedge species
Carex davyi Mack. Davy\'s sedge species
Carex debilis Michx. white edge sedge species
Carex decomposita Muhl. cypressknee sedge species
Carex deflexa Hornem. northern sedge species
Carex densa (L.H. Bailey) L.H. Bailey dense sedge species
Carex deweyana Schwein. Dewey\'s sedge species
Carex diandra Schrank lesser panicled sedge species
Carex digitalis Willd. slender woodland sedge species
Carex donnell-smithii L.H. Bailey Donell\'s sedge species
Carex douglasii Boott Douglas\' sedge species
Carex ebenea Rydb. ebony sedge species
Carex eburnea Boott bristleleaf sedge species
Carex egglestonii Mack. Eggleston\'s sedge species
Carex elliottii Schwein. & Torr. Elliott\'s sedge species
Carex elynoides Holm blackroot sedge species
Carex emoryi Dewey Emory\'s sedge species
Carex engelmannii L.H. Bailey Engelmann\'s sedge species
Carex exilis Dewey coastal sedge species
Carex exsiccata L.H. Bailey western inflated sedge species
Carex festucacea Schkuhr ex Willd. fescue sedge species
Carex feta L. H. Bailey greensheath sedge species
Carex filifolia Nutt. threadleaf sedge species
Carex fissa Mack. hammock sedge species
Carex flacca Schreb. heath sedge species
Carex flaccosperma Dewey thinfruit sedge species
Carex flava L. yellow sedge species
Carex floridana Schwein. Florida sedge species
Carex foenea Willd. dry-spike sedge species
Carex folliculata L. norther long sedge species
Carex formosa Dewey handsome sedge species
Carex fracta Mack. fragile sheath sedge species
Carex frankii Kunth Frank\'s sedge species
Carex garberi Fernald elk sedge species
Carex geophila Mack. White Mountain sedge species
Carex geyeri Boott Geyer\'s sedge species
Carex gigantea Rudge giant sedge species
Carex glacialis Mack. glacial sedge species
Carex glareosa Schkuhr ex Wahlenb. lesser salt marsh sedge species
Carex glaucescens Elliott southern waxy sedge species
Carex glaucodea Tuck. ex Olney blue sedge species
Carex globosa Boott roundfruit sedge species
Carex gmelinii Hook. & Arn. Gmelin\'s sedge species
Carex gracillima Schwein. graceful sedge species
Carex granularis Muhl. ex Willd. limestone meadow sedge species
Carex gravida L.H. Bailey heavy sedge species
Carex grayi J. Carey Gray\'s sedge species
Carex grisea Wahlenb. inflated narrow-leaf sedge species
Carex gynandra Schwein. nodding sedge species
Carex gynocrates Wormsk. northern bog sedge species
Carex gynodynama Olney Olney\'s hairy sedge species
Carex halliana L.H. Bailey Hall\'s sedge species
Carex hallii Olney deer sedge species
Carex harfordii Mack. Harford\'s sedge species
Carex hassei L.H. Bailey salt sedge species
Carex haydenii Dewey Hayden\'s sedge species
Carex helleri Mack. Heller\'s sedge species
Carex hendersonii L. H. Bailey Henderson\'s sedge species
Carex heteroneura S.Watson different-nerve sedge species
Carex hirsutella Mack. fuzzy sedge species
Carex hirta L. hammer sedge species
Carex hirtifolia Mack. pubescent sedge species
Carex hirtissima W. Boott fuzzy sedge species
Carex hitchcockiana Dewey Hitchcock\'s sedge species
Carex holostoma Drejer arctic marsh sedge species
Carex hoodii Boott Hood\'s sedge species
Carex hookeriana Dewey Hooker\'s sedge species
Carex hormathodes Fernald marsh straw sedge species
Carex houghtoniana Torr. ex Dewey Houghton\'s sedge species
Carex hyalina Boott tissue sedge species
Carex hyalinolepis Steud shoreline sedge species
Carex hystericina Muhl. ex Willd. bottlebrush sedge species
Carex idahoa L. H. Bailey Idaho sedge species
Carex illota L. H. Bailey sheep sedge species
Carex incurviformis Mack. coastal sand sedge species
Carex inops L. H. Bailey long-stolon sedge species
Carex integra Mack. smoothbeak sedge species
Carex interior L. H. Bailey inland sedge species
Carex interrupta Boeckeler greenfruit sedge species
Carex intumescens Rudge greater bladder sedge species
Carex jamesii Schwein. James\' sedge species
Carex jonesii L.H. Bailey Jones\' sedge species
Carex joorii L.H. Bailey cypress swamp sedge species
Carex lacustris Willd. hairy sedge? (lake sedge) species
Carex laeviculmis Meinsh. smoothstem sedge species
Carex laxiculmis Schwein. spreading sedge species
Carex laxiflora Lam. broad looseflower sedge species
Carex leavenworthii Dewey Leavenworth\'s sedge species
Carex lemmonii W. Boott Lemmon\'s sedge species
Carex lenticularis Michx. lakeshore sedge species
Carex leporinella Mack. Sierra hare sedge species
Carex leptalea Wahlenb. bristlystalked sedge species
Carex leptonervia (Fernald) Fernald nerveless woodland sedge species
Carex limosa L. mud sedge species
Carex livida (Wahlenb.) Willd. livid sedge species
Carex loliacea L. ryegrass sedge species
Carex lonchocarpa Willd. ex Spreng. southern long sedge species
Carex longii Mack. Long\'s sedge species
Carex louisianica L. H. Bailey Louisiana sedge species
Carex lucorum Willd. Blue Ridge sedge species
Carex lupuliformis Sartwell ex Dewey false hop sedge species
Carex lupulina Muhl. ex Willd. hop sedge species
Carex lurida Wahlenb. shallow sedge species
Carex luzulina Olney woodrush sedge species
Carex lyngbyei Hornem. Lyngbye\'s sedge species
Carex macloviana d\'Urv. thickhead sedge species
Carex macrocephala Willd. ex Spreng. largehead sedge species
Carex macrochaeta C. A. Mey. longawn sedge species
Carex marina Dewey sea sedge species
Carex mariposana L.H. Bailey ex Mack. Mariposa sedge species
Carex meadii Dewey Mead\'s sedge species
Carex membranacea Hook. fragile sedge species
Carex merritt-fernaldii Mack. Fernald\'s sedge species
Carex mertensii Prescott ex Bong. Mertens\' sedge species
Carex michauxiana Boeckeler Michaux\'s sedge species
Carex microdonta Torr. littletooth sedge species
Carex microglochin Wahlenb. fewseeded bog sedge species
Carex micropoda C. A. Mey. species
Carex microptera Mack. small wing sedge species
Carex misera Buckley wretched sedge species
Carex mitchelliana M. A. Curtis Mitchell\'s sedge species
Carex molesta Mack. troublesome sedge species
Carex muehlenbergii Willd. Muehlenberg\'s sedge species
Carex multicaulis L.H. Bailey manystem sedge species
Carex multicostata Mack. manyrib sedge species
Carex muricata L. rough sedge species
Carex muskingumensis Schwein. Muskingum sedge species
Carex nebraskensis Dewey Nebraska sedge species
Carex nervina L.H. Bailey Sierra sedge species
Carex neurophora Mack. alpine nerve sedge species
Carex nigromarginata Schwein. black edge sedge species
Carex normalis Mack. greater straw sedge species
Carex norvegica Retz. Norway sedge species
Carex nudata W. Boott naked sedge species
Carex obnupta L. H. Bailey slough sedge species
Carex obtusata Lilj. obtuse sedge species
Carex occidentalis L. H. Bailey western sedge species
Carex oligosperma Michx. fewseed sedge species
Carex oreocharis Holm grassyslope sedge species
Carex ormostachya Wiegand necklace spike sedge species
Carex oxylepis Torr. & Hook. sharpscale sedge species
Carex paleacea Schreb. ex Wahlenb. chaffy sedge species
Carex pallescens L. pale sedge species
Carex panicea L. grass-like sedge species
Carex pansa L.H. Bailey Payson\'s sedge species
Carex pauciflora Lightf. fewflower sedge species
Carex peckii Howe Peck\'s sedge species
Carex pedunculata Muhl. ex Willd. longstalk sedge species
Carex pellita Muhl ex Willd. wooly sedge species
Carex pensylvanica Lam. Pensylvania sedge species
Carex perglobosa Mack. globe sedge species
Carex petricosa Dewey rockdwelling sedge species
Carex phaeocephala Piper dunhead sedge species
Carex picta Steud. Boott\'s sedge species
Carex pityophila Mack. loving sedge species
Carex planostachys Kunze cedar sedge species
Carex plantaginea Lam. plantainleaf sedge species
Carex platyphylla J. Carey broadleaf sedge species
Carex podocarpa R. Br. shortstalk sedge species
Carex polystachya Sw. ex Wahlenb. Caribbean sedge species
Carex praeceptorium Mack. early sedge species
Carex praegracilis W. Boott clustered field sedge species
Carex prairea Dewey ex Alph.Wood prairie sedge species
Carex prasina Wahlenb. drooping sedge species
Carex praticola Rydb. meadow sedge species
Carex preslii Steud. Presl\'s sedge species
Carex projecta Mack. necklace sedge species
Carex proposita Mack. Great Smoky Mountain sedge species
Carex pseudocyperus L. cypress-like sedge species
Carex purpurifera Mack. purple sedge species
Carex radiata (Wahlenb.) Small eastern star sedge species
Carex rariflora (Wahlenb.) Sm. looseflower alpine sedge species
Carex raynoldsii Dewey Raynolds\' sedge species
Carex recta Boott estuary sedge species
Carex reniformis (L.H. Bailey) Small kidneyshape sedge species
Carex retroflexa Muhl. ex Willd. reflexed sedge species
Carex rosea Willd. rosy sedge species
Carex rossii Boott Ross\' sedge species
Carex rostrata Stokes beaked sedge species
Carex rufina Drejer snowbed sedge species
Carex rupestris All. curly sedge species
Carex sartwellii Dewey Sartwell\'s sedge species
Carex saxatilis L. rock sedge species
Carex scabrata Schwein. eastern rough sedge species
Carex scabriuscula Mack. Siskiyou sedge species
Carex schweinitzii Dewey ex Schwein. Schweinitz\'s sedge species
Carex scirpoidea Michx. northern singlespike sedge species
Carex scoparia Willd. broom sedge species
Carex scopulorum Holm mountain sedge species
Carex senta Boott swamp carex species
Carex seorsa Howe weak stellate sedge species
Carex shortiana Dewey & Torr. Short\'s sedge species
Carex simulata Mack. analogue sedge species
Carex socialis Mohlenbr. & Schwegman low woodland sedge species
Carex sparganioides Muhl. ex Willd. bur-reed sedge species
Carex specifica L.H. Bailey narrowfruit sedge species
Carex spectabilis Dewey showy sedge species
Carex spicata Huds. prickly sedge species
Carex spissa L.H.Bailey ex Hemsl. San Diego sedge species
Carex sprengelii Dewey ex Spreng. Sprengel\'s sedge species
Carex squarrosa L. squarrose sedge species
Carex sterilis Willd. dioecious sedge species
Carex stipata Muhl. ex Willd. awlfruit sedge species
Carex straminea Willd. ex Schkuhr straw sedge species
Carex striata Michx. Walter\'s sedge species
Carex striatula Michx. lined sedge species
Carex stricta Lam. upright sedge species
Carex styloflexa Buckley bent sedge species
Carex stylosa C. A. Mey. variegated sedge species
Carex subbracteata Mack. smallbract sedge species
Carex supina Willd. ex Wahlenb. weak arctic sedge species
Carex swanii (Fernald) Mack. Swan\'s sedge species
Carex sylvatica Huds. European woodland sedge species
Carex tenera Dewey quill sedge species
Carex tetanica Schkuhr rigid sedge species
Carex torreyi Tuck. Torrey\'s sedge species
Carex tribuloides Wahlenb. blunt broom sedge species
Carex tuckermanii Boott Tuckerman\'s sedge species
Carex turgescens Torr. pine barren sedge species
Carex typhina Michx. cattail sedge species
Carex umbellata Willd. parasol sedge species
Carex verrucosa Muhl. warty sedge species
Carex vesicaria L. blister sedge species
Carex viridula Michx. little green sedge species
Carex vulpina L. true-fox sedge species
Carex vulpinoidea Michx. fox sedge species
Carex willdenowii Willd. Willdenow\'s sedge species
Carex woodii Dewey Wood\'s sedge species
Carex xerantica L.H. Bailey whitescale sedge species
Cymophyllus fraseri (Ker Gawl.) Kartesz & Gandhi Fraser\'s cymophyllous species
Kobresia simpliciuscula (Wahlenb.) Mack. simple bog sedge species
Usage rights Use license

Open Data Commons Attribution License

Characters used in the key

Species

Country

U.S. state

Canadian province or territory

Section within Carex

Culm height

Blade width

Inflorescence type

Proximal spike sexuality

Terminal spike sexuality

Stigma branch number

Perigynium length

Perigynium width

Perigynium cross-section shape

Achene length

Achene width

Achene cross-section shape

Style: whether deciduous or persistent

Image author

Image type

Software specification Name

Carices Interactive Visual Identification Key

Version

1.1

Interface language

English

Platform

Silverlight runtime

Web location

http://www.herbarium2.lsu.edu/aba/

Software technical features

Main XAML page

UserControl x:Class="A5.MainPage"

xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"

xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"

xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"

xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"

xmlns:local="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Pivot;assembly=System.Windows.Pivot"

mc:Ignorable="d" d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="400" Loaded="UserControl_Loaded">

<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="Black">

<local:PivotViewer x:Name="Pivot"/>

</Grid>

</UserControl>

XAML.CS or Code behind

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

using System.Linq;

using System.Net;

using System.Windows;

using System.Windows.Controls;

using System.Windows.Documents;

using System.Windows.Input;

using System.Windows.Media;

using System.Windows.Media.Animation;

using System.Windows.Shapes;

using System.Windows.Pivot;

namespace A10

{

public partial class MainPage: UserControl

{

public MainPage()

{

InitializeComponent();

Pivot.LoadCollection(

"http://www.herbarium2.lsu.edu/aba/A10.cxml"

, string.Empty);

}

private void UserControl_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)

{

}

}

Additional information

Later examples of visual keys deal with the clustering problem differently. Both Silverlight and HTML 5 based grass genera of Louisiana keys use existing herbarium specimen images to normalize, one herbarium specimen per taxon. Leveraging recent physical and vetted sources. This normalization character is select-able as \'one-to-one comparisons\' at the bottom of character information panel http://www.herbarium2.lsu.edu/grass2/. Secondly, Kingdom Plantae in HTML 5 is normalized by image number only, without a selectable character state, across divisions http://www.herbarium2.lsu.edu/aca/. Magnoliophyta is taken at a log value due to its disparate taxa value when compared to the other divisions.

Acknowledgements

The author sincerely appreciates the ground-breaking work completed by others before this project even began. Without these prior efforts, this current project could not have been completed in this same time-frame. A sincere thank you to all the editors of Flora of North America, Volume 23, and the image contributors. To G. Wilder, J. Bissell, M. Barkworth, A. Reznicek, K. Niklas, and my Ph.D. advisor, L. Urbatsch, thank you for sharing your wisdom and support. Also, I wish to thank W. Thomas and K. Thiele, for editorial commentary provided for this manuscript.

Author contributions

Jones developed the project, and contacted the other contibutors for images. S. Matson and T. Reznicek both mailed a DVD copy of their Carex field images. L. Urbatsch\'s teaching-microscopy-images were copied and saved to USB thumbdrives. New York Botanical Garden Press permitted the use of the images of both North American Cariceae volumes by Mackenzie, K.K. Remaining image owners were found on the WWW and contacted by email. Thankfully, they granted permission for usage, including; F. Starr & K. Starr, N. Nyugen, and A. Debolt. R. Mohlenbrock\'s image was gathered from Plants.gov.

References Ball P. W. Reznicek A. A. 2002 Flora of North America. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part); Cyperaceae. Vol. 23. 23 Oxford University Press New York 608 [in English] http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=10246 0-19-515207-7 Mackenzie K. K. 1940 North American Cariceae 1 & 2 New York Botanical Garden Press New York 539 Microsoft 2007 .NET Framework Microsoft 2007-11-20T00:00:00+02:00 http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=21 Version: 3.5 Microsoft 2008 Deep Zoom Microsoft 2008-10-13T00:00:00+03:00 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645050%28VS.95%29.aspx Version: 0.9.000.5 Microsoft 2010 Microsoft Silverlight PivotViewer Microsoft 2010-08-09T00:00:00+03:00 http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=17747 Microsoft 2010 Pivot Collection Tool for the Command Line Microsoft 2010-07-13T00:00:00+03:00 http://pauthor.codeplex.com/ Version: 1.2 Queensland The University Of 2006 Lucid Software 3.4 http://www.lucidcentral.com/ Supplementary files Tertiary file structure for Carices CXML file

Authors: Jones, T. M.

Data type: occurences, morphological,

File: A10.cxml

Secondary Carex morphology data; cleaned and truncated for building CXML

Authors: Jones, T. M.

Data type: occurrences, morphological, images

This file is an example of a build file for the creation of the CXML file.

File: 957am fixed scirpoidea space issue.xlsx

Website data from Utah State University

Authors: Google Analytics

Data type: PDF

Data sheet for visitiation to CIIK by country

File: Analytics utc.usu.edu_keys_Carex_Carex.html Location 20060531-20130630.pdf

Website data from Louisiana State University

Authors: Google Analytics

Data type: PDF

Data sheet for visitiation to CIIK by country

File: Analytics Carex key LSU Location 20060531-20130630.pdf

Primary Carex morphology data from Lucid 3.4

Authors: Jones, T. M.

Data type: XLSX

Export from CIIK 2013 in CSV format

File: Carex-all-CSV.xlsx

CIVIK usage 2011 - 2013

Authors: Google Analytics

Data type: PDF

This includes all visual keys developed. Here CIVIK is represented by both /aba/ and /aaa/ and iteratives.

File: Analytics www.herbarium2.lsu.edu_aaa_A5TestPage.html Pages 20100531-20130630.pdf

Visual keys usage with Google Analytics

Authors: Google

Data type: analytics

Compilation of all visual keys using Google Analytics

File: Analytics www.herbarium2.lsu.edu-aaa-A5TestPage.html Language 20100809-20130908.pdf

Workflow of project

The Visual Carices of North America upon instantiation in default grid setting.

Tiled image set illustrating the change in file size as well as number of images by creating a geometric series of images

An Interactive Visual Identification Key to Carices of North America beta version.